Legal Minefield: DOJ Weighs Biden Pardons

Biden’s last-minute pardons are back in the spotlight as James Comer says they should be wiped out.

Quick Take

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer says Biden’s final pardons should be treated as null and void.
Comer says his committee found no clear proof Biden joined the pardon talks or approved the final process.
House Republicans sent their autopen report to the Justice Department for review ^[3].
Legal experts cited by critics say autopen use does not, by itself, void a pardon ^[11]^[12].

Comer Puts Biden Pardons Back on the Hook

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer told Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo that former President Joe Biden’s last-minute pardons should be declared null and void. Comer said his committee found no meetings, no notes, and no proof that Biden took part in the pardon decisions. He tied that claim to the committee’s new report on Biden’s use of an autopen for official actions ^[2]^[3].

Comer’s argument focused on process, not just the machine. He said the issue was not only that staff used an autopen, but that no one involved in the pardon process met with Biden about the individual pardons. He also said the House Oversight Committee’s depositions showed Biden was not “at the table” when the decisions were made ^[2]^[4].

What the Oversight Report Claims

The House Oversight Committee’s report says senior Biden staff may have exercised presidential power without clear approval from Biden himself. The committee says its review found a weak chain of custody for key decisions and raised concerns about how the autopen was used in the final stretch of Biden’s term ^[3]^[8]. The report also pushed for further review by the Justice Department ^[3].

The claims reached beyond paperwork and into the bigger fight over Biden’s fitness and control of the White House. Comer and other Republicans have argued that aides hid Biden’s decline while using the autopen on major actions, including pardons and executive orders. Critics say the report offers sharp accusations but not a public, document-by-document proof trail for each pardon it questions ^[17]^[8].

Why the Legal Fight Is Far from Settled

Legal experts cited by Biden’s critics say the Constitution gives the president pardon power and does not require a handwritten signature. They also point to older legal guidance saying a president may direct a subordinate to use an autopen. Other experts say once a pardon is granted, it cannot simply be erased by a later political or legal order ^[11]^[12]^[14].

🔥 Comer Drops Bombshell: Biden’s Last-Minute Pardons Should Be Declared NULL & VOID Which Puts Fauci At Risk

House Oversight Chairman James Comer went on Fox with Maria Bartiromo Monday and declared that all of Joe Biden’s final pardons should be thrown out as illegitimate.… pic.twitter.com/60qesYUBHx

— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) June 23, 2026

That legal clash matters because Comer’s demand goes beyond investigation and into invalidation. A congressional committee can press for review, but it does not itself erase a presidential pardon. That is why this fight now sits with the Justice Department and, if challenged, likely the courts. For readers worried about executive overreach, the bigger issue is whether unelected staff steered presidential power without clear proof of direct approval ^[6]^[7]^[12].