Louisiana Attorney General Appeals Ruling on Ten Commandments Display in Public Schools

Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill challenges a federal judge’s ruling, determined to battle for the Ten Commandments’ presence in public school classrooms, highlighting a clash deeply rooted in religious freedom and constitutional rights.

At a Glance

  • In June 2024, Louisiana mandated Ten Commandments displays in public school classrooms.
  • Federal Judge John W. deGravelles declared this law unconstitutional, halting its enforcement.
  • The law was criticized for promoting a singular religious ideology.
  • Attorney General Liz Murrill intends to appeal the ruling.

Louisiana’s Ten Commandments Law

In June, the Louisiana legislature enacted a law that required the Ten Commandments to be displayed prominently in every public school classroom in the state. The law, House Bill 71, stirred waves of controversy, sparking a fierce debate over religious expression and constitutional provisions. Proponents argue it restores traditional values, while critics label it a blatant coercion, perpetuating a narrow sect of Christianity at the taxpayers’ expense.

This dispute echoes a long-standing struggle over church-state separation. Federal Judge John W. deGravelles recently struck down the bill, declaring it unconstitutional and blocking its enforcement. His decision was based on the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1980 Stone v. Graham ruling, which rejected a similar law in Kentucky. deGravelles said public schools should not be arenas for religious conversion or imposition. The ruling directly impacts five districts but potentially reverberates throughout the state.

“This ruling will ensure that Louisiana families, not politicians or public school officials, get to decide if, when and how their children engage with religion,” said Rachel Laser, who is President of the group Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Attorney General’s Stance

Despite the ruling, state Attorney General Liz Murrill is pushing forward. She announced plans to appeal the decision, saying the constitutional interpretations unfairly limit religious expressions in public educational arenas. This stance reflects the state’s resolve to challenge federal judicial boundaries on religious freedom and expression, viewing the Ten Commandments as more than religious texts but as foundational societal elements.

This dispute highlights a wider societal battle over religious distinctiveness in public life. The state’s challenge evokes larger questions about religious privilege and control within publicly funded institutions. The broader community remains divided over the implications, with some fearing a governmental overreach into private belief systems while others argue for the preservation of traditional values as a societal cornerstone.

Legal, Societal Implications

The ruling and appeal have amplified public discourse around religion’s place in public schools. Religious advocates argue the importance of distinctive privileges for religious establishments while safeguarding them from excessive state interference.

“We show how a Free Exercise-based conception of religious distinctiveness generates significant advantages for religious individuals (including staff in public schools) and institutions while simultaneously insulating them from state control. Government, once subject to a distinctive limitation on promoting or sponsoring religion, now must afford religion distinctive privileges,” said Robert Tuttle, a Professor of Law at George Washington University.

The outcome of the appeal could forge a pivotal legal precedent, potentially recalibrating how religious imagery interacts with public education’s secular fabric. The resolution will offer significant insights into the evolving dialogue between freedom of religion and governmental boundaries.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR