Democrat strategist Ruy Teixeira delivers a sobering reality check: “The progressive moment is well and truly over.”
At a Glance
- Ruy Teixeira claims progressives have weakened their political power by supporting mass migration
- Public opinion consistently favors strong border security, contrary to progressive advocacy
- A CBS News survey shows significant voter support for deporting undocumented immigrants, even among minority groups
- Some Democrats and journalists downplay migration’s political impact, viewing opposition as bigotry
The Fall of Progressive Influence
Ruy Teixeira, a prominent Democratic political strategist, has delivered a stark assessment of the current state of progressivism in American politics. Teixeira argues that the progressive movement’s influential moment has come to an end, largely due to its stance on immigration and border policies.
This revelation comes as a significant shift from Teixeira’s earlier predictions and highlights the growing disconnect between progressive ideals and mainstream voter concerns.
The tide is turning, people!
Teixeira’s analysis suggests that loosening restrictions on illegal immigration was a critical misstep, one that has proven deeply unpopular with voters across the political spectrum. This miscalculation has not only weakened the progressive movement but also potentially jeopardized the Democratic Party’s electoral prospects.
TEIXEIRA: THE PROGRESSIVE MOMENT IS OVER
Democratic political pundit Ruy Teixeira declares that “The Progressive Moment Is Over”. He writes:
“It wasn’t so long ago progressives were riding high. They had a moment; they really did. Their radical views set the agenda and tone…
— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) October 26, 2024
The Shifting Landscape of Public Opinion
Contrary to progressive advocacy, public opinion consistently favors strong border security. A CBS News survey reveals significant voter support for deporting undocumented immigrants, including among minority groups. This stark contrast between progressive policies and voter preferences underscores the growing divide between the Democratic Party’s left wing and the general electorate.
Teixeira’s assessment is particularly noteworthy given his previous work. His 2004 book predicted a Democratic majority through a coalition of migrants, women, and white-collar workers. However, this coalition, influenced by West Coast tech investors, led to policies that benefited Wall Street but harmed American workers. The current backlash against these policies suggests a significant miscalculation in the long-term viability of this strategy.
The implications of this shift extend beyond just the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. Other strategists, like Nate Silver, have also pointed to immigration policy as a potential boon for Republican gains. This sentiment is echoed in Silver’s analysis of Vice President Kamala Harris’s political vulnerabilities.
“This data tells a really clear story. Immigration and the economy are huge liabilities for Harris. In fact, they’re basically her only liabilities. They offset strong issues for her on abortion, democracy, and Trump’s personal attributes,” pollster Nate Silver said.
Harris’s inability to develop a crossover immigration policy, largely due to reliance on pro-migration donors, exemplifies the broader challenge facing the Democratic Party. This dilemma is further complicated by the tendency of some Democrats and journalists to downplay migration’s political impact, often viewing opposition as rooted in bigotry rather than legitimate policy concerns.
Could we be on the verge of seeing an end to this madness?
And will Gen Z be the generation to help us stop it?