Council’s Prop Ban Triggers Heated Discussion on Free Speech Rights

New Jersey council bans American flag and Constitution, sparking outrage as resident is forcibly removed from meeting.

At a Glance

  • Edison Township Council in New Jersey bans use of “props,” including American flag and Constitution, during public hearings
  • Resident Joel Bassoff expelled from meeting for waving flag and citing Constitution
  • Ban aimed at maintaining order, but residents argue it violates free speech rights
  • Incident sparks heated debate and potential legal challenges

Edison Township Council Bans Patriotic Symbols

In a move that has ignited a firestorm of controversy, the Edison Township Council in New Jersey has implemented a ban on the use of “props” during public hearings, explicitly including the American flag and the U.S. Constitution. This decision, ostensibly aimed at maintaining order and decorum, has instead sparked a heated debate about the boundaries of free speech and the right to petition the government.

The ordinance, passed by the Edison Municipal Council, considers props an impediment to orderly conduct during meetings. However, this attempt to streamline proceedings has backfired spectacularly, with residents and legal experts alike questioning the constitutionality of prohibiting symbols of American democracy in a public forum.

Resident Expelled for Defying Ban

The controversy came to a head during a recent council meeting when resident Joel Bassoff, an attorney, decided to challenge the ordinance. Bassoff began his address to the council by holding up a copy of the Constitution, arguing for his right to petition the government. Council President Nishith Patel swiftly interrupted, warning Bassoff that using the Constitution as a prop would forfeit his speaking time.

“The U.S. Constitution gives the public the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances,” Bassoff said while lifting up a copy of the document. “Every member of the council took a solemn oath to uphold the Constitution.”

Undeterred, Bassoff then held up an American flag, asserting his constitutional rights. This act of defiance led to the council temporarily recessing the meeting and Bassoff being escorted out by police officers, all while garnering vocal support from the audience.

Community Outrage and Legal Implications

The incident has ignited community outrage, with many residents viewing the council’s actions as a direct assault on their constitutional rights. Maryann Hennessey, another resident, criticized the ban as an insult to the American flag and its symbolism. The backlash was so intense that a subsequent council meeting on November 25 lasted a grueling five hours due to public opposition.

Council President Nishith Patel took an aggressive and hostile stance to the members of the public who objected. “As you continue to be using the Constitution as a prop, as I warned you, your time is forfeited,” Patel said. “If you’re going to continue interfering with the decorum, then you should be removed.”

Bassoff, leveraging his legal background, has suggested that the council’s actions may have serious legal repercussions. He argues that the ban infringes on fundamental constitutional rights and warns of potential lawsuits. This stance has resonated with many in the community who see the ordinance as an overreach of local government authority.

Balancing Order and Free Speech

The Edison Township Council’s ban on props highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing the need for orderly public meetings with the constitutional right to free speech. While the council aims to maintain decorum, critics argue that prohibiting symbols like the American flag and Constitution goes too far, stifling citizens’ ability to express themselves effectively in civic discourse.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR